Competitor SEO Analysis: How to Spy on Your Rivals' Backlinks

I used to do link building the hard way. Cold pitching random sites. Guessing which editors might care. Sending maybe 50 emails to get one reply, if I was lucky.

Then I pulled up a competitor's backlink profile. Just curious. And there it was: a list of sites that had already said yes to someone in my space. Sites that accept guest posts from my industry. Sites where the editor actually knows what we do.

It felt like cheating. It's not.

Your competitors spent months figuring out which sites matter. They tested the pitches, built the relationships, got rejected a bunch of times. All that trial and error is sitting in their backlink profile, waiting for you to copy it.

Why this actually works

Most link builders waste time on dead ends. I did for months. Pitching sites that never link out. Chasing domains with zero traffic. Ignoring all the signals that would have saved me dozens of hours.

Here's the thing: if a site links to three of your rivals, they clearly accept your industry. The editor knows your space. They've greenlit similar content before. Your pitch just became way easier.

You also get context. You see which content formats work. Blog posts? Case studies? Data visualizations? You see which angles earn links. You stop guessing.

The data shows weaknesses too. One competitor I analyzed had 500 backlinks but only 80 unique domains. That's a lot of eggs in few baskets. Easy to outflank by targeting different sites they missed.

First, figure out who you're actually competing with

Here's something I got wrong for a while: your business competitors aren't always your SEO competitors. The landscaping company across town might be your rival for jobs, but if they're not ranking for your target keywords, who cares about their backlinks?

The sites ranking for your target keywords are what matter here.

I grab my top 5-10 money keywords and just search them. Old school. Note who keeps showing up in positions 1-10. Those are the real SERP competitors. Google trusts them. They're sitting on the ranking real estate I want.

Ahrefs or Semrush speed this up if you want. Both have competitor discovery features. Plug in your domain, they show who ranks for the same keywords. Export the list. You'll reference it constantly.

Stick to 5-10 competitors max. More than that and you drown in spreadsheets. Less than that and you miss patterns.

Pull their entire backlink history

Now you grab everything. Every tool does this slightly differently but the process is basically the same.

In Ahrefs, Site Explorer, enter a competitor's domain, hit the "Backlinks" tab. You'll see every link pointing at them, or at least the ones Ahrefs knows about. Export the full list as CSV. Repeat for each competitor.

In Semrush, it's Backlink Analytics. Same drill. Moz calls it Link Explorer.

These columns matter:

• Referring domain (the site linking to them)
• Domain Authority or Authority Score (how strong that site is)
• Anchor text (the clickable text used in the link)
• Target URL (which page on your competitor's site got the link)
• Link type (dofollow vs nofollow)

You want dofollow links from high-authority domains. Those are the ones that actually move rankings.

The link gap analysis (this is where it gets good)

This is the part that changed everything for me. A link gap analysis shows you sites that link to multiple competitors but not to you. These are your warmest leads.

Ahrefs has a tool literally called "Link Intersect." Enter your domain and up to 10 competitors. It spits out every domain linking to them but not you. Sort by Domain Rating. Top of that list is gold.

Semrush calls it "Backlink Gap." Same concept, color-coded so you can see which competitors share which links.

Why does this work? These sites have already said yes to your industry. They link to similar content. They're reachable, your competitors reached them. They have traffic and authority worth chasing.

You're not cold pitching strangers anymore. You're approaching warm leads with proof that they link to stuff like yours.

Figure out what content actually earns links

Next question: what type of content earns these links? You need to reverse-engineer their linkable assets.

In Ahrefs, "Best by links" under Pages shows which individual pages on a competitor's site have the most referring domains. Patterns emerge fast.

Maybe their ultimate guides crush it. Maybe their original research reports. Maybe their free tools. Whatever format keeps appearing, that's your blueprint.

Click into a high-performing page. Check the Backlinks tab for that specific URL. Read the anchor text. See what angle people use to link to it. Are they citing data? Referencing a quote? Linking to a tool?

Now you know what to build. Something similar but better. More data. Better design. Clearer insights. Then pitch it to the same sites that linked to the competitor's version.

What their anchor text tells you

Anchor text patterns reveal a lot. They show you what's natural in your niche. They also expose risky tactics you should avoid.

Export a competitor's anchor text report. Categorize what you see:

• Branded (their company name)
• Generic ("click here", "this article")
• URL (naked domain or URL)
• Exact-match (keyword-stuffed anchors)

A healthy profile is mostly branded and generic. Some partial-match phrases. Very few exact-match keyword anchors. If you see tons of exact-match anchors like "best SEO tool for startups" repeated over and over, that's a red flag. Either old-school spam or they're playing with fire.

Google's guidelines are clear: manipulative anchor text schemes can trigger penalties. You want your anchor profile to look natural. Studying competitors shows you what natural actually looks like in your space.

The broken link trick (sneaky but effective)

This one feels sneaky but it works. Find pages on your competitor's site that used to have links but now return 404 errors. Those linking sites need a replacement. You can be that replacement.

In Ahrefs, filter a competitor's "Best by links" report to show only 404 pages. Sort by referring domains. Any page with 10+ referring domains is worth recreating.

Check what the page used to be about. Use the Wayback Machine if you need to. Then build your own version. Reach out to every site still linking to the dead page. Let them know the link is broken. Offer your updated, live resource as a replacement.

They want to fix broken links. You're making their job easier. Conversion rate on this approach is surprisingly good.

Keep tabs on how fast they're building links

Link velocity is the rate at which a site gains new backlinks. It tells you what's realistic in your niche and helps you avoid unnatural spikes that look spammy to Google.

I track my top 3 competitors monthly. Note how many new referring domains they gain each month. Average it out. That's your baseline for what's normal.

If competitors in your space gain like 5-10 new domains per month, don't suddenly launch a campaign that gets you 50 in a week. That screams manipulation. Match the natural pace. Stay under the radar.

Also watch for lost links. If a competitor's backlink count drops sharply, something happened. Maybe they got penalized. Maybe they removed bad links. Dig into it. Learn from their mistakes before you make the same ones.

Steal their guest post targets

Guest posting still works if you do it right. Your competitors can show you which sites accept guest contributions in your niche.

Filter a competitor's backlinks for author bio links. These usually come from guest posts. In Ahrefs, search the anchor text column for their name or company name. Look for links from "/author/" URLs or author bio sections.

Export that list. Vet each site:

• Does it have actual traffic?
• Is the content quality decent?
• Are comments and engagement real?
• Is the domain authority respectable?

Good sites get added to your outreach list. Weak sites get ignored. Now you have a pre-qualified list of guest posting opportunities. Pitch them something better than what your competitor published.

Mistakes I've made (so you don't have to)

Chasing too many competitors spreads you thin. Stick to 5-10 max. More than that and you're just analyzing, not doing.

Ignoring link relevance kills results. A link from a high-DA site in a completely unrelated niche does almost nothing. Topical relevance matters more than raw authority.

Copying spammy tactics backfires. If a competitor is buying links from sketchy networks or stuffing exact-match anchors, don't follow them. You'll both get penalized eventually. Only copy the white-hat stuff.

Focusing only on dofollow links misses context. Some nofollow links, like those from major publications or Reddit, send traffic and build brand credibility. They still matter.

According to Google's official guidelines, paid links must use rel="sponsored" and user-generated content links need rel="ugc". If competitors aren't following this, note it. Don't repeat their compliance mistakes.

The tools I actually use

You can do basic competitor analysis with free tools but paid ones save massive time.

Ahrefs is the gold standard for backlink data. Huge index. The link intersect tool is unmatched. Expensive but worth it if you're serious about this.

Semrush is the main alternative. Slightly different data but equally powerful. The backlink gap tool is excellent. They bundle other SEO features too.

Moz has smaller index coverage but their Domain Authority metric is still widely used. Good for quick checks.

Screaming Frog handles technical audits. Use it to crawl competitor sites and analyze internal linking structure.

For free options, Google Search Console shows who links to you. Won't show competitor data but it's a baseline for comparison.

Or skip the manual work entirely

Manual competitor analysis takes hours. Clicking through hundreds of backlinks. Cross-referencing data. Building spreadsheets. Sending cold emails.

Revised handles the boring parts. The platform scans your niche and surfaces high-value contextual backlink prospects automatically. It identifies broken link opportunities on authority sites before you even ask.

It tracks competitor mentions so you know when they gain new links. Flags risky links in your own profile. Provides analytics dashboards showing exactly which links drive traffic and rankings.

You focus on strategy and relationships. Revised handles the data grind.

Try Revised for free and get competitor insights in minutes instead of days.

What a full analysis week looks like

Here's roughly how I break this down:

Day 1-2: Identify 5 SERP competitors. Pull their domain-level backlink overviews. Record total referring domains, authority scores, and estimated traffic.

Day 3-4: Run link gap analysis. Export domains linking to 2+ competitors but not you. Sort by authority. Build a prioritized outreach list.

Day 5-6: Analyze their best-performing content. Identify linkable assets. Study anchor text distribution. Spot patterns and red flags.

Day 7-8: Find broken link opportunities. Filter for 404 pages with 10+ referring domains. Plan content to replace those dead pages.

Ongoing: Track monthly. Monitor new/lost referring domains. Measure link velocity. Iterate based on what's working.

This gives you a 90-day roadmap minimum. You'll have more qualified link targets than you can outreach in a quarter.

The bottom line

Competitor SEO analysis isn't cheating. It's efficiency. Your rivals spent time and money testing the market. Use their lessons. Avoid their mistakes. Target their proven link sources with better content.

The brands that rank on page one didn't guess their way there. They studied the competition. They identified gaps. They executed smarter, not just harder.

Start with one competitor. Pull their backlinks. Find the gaps. Pitch better content to those sites. Build momentum from there.

Or let Revised do the heavy lifting while you focus on growing your business.

For more on building a strong backlink profile, check out our guide on how to build backlinks and authority for your website. If you're just getting started, read backlink building for startups to see what actually works in 2025.